Why You Shouldn't Use Wooden Racking When Transporting Vehicles

(1 April, 2016)

Why You Shouldnt Use Wooden Racking When Transporting Vehicles

 Many would be surprised and concerned about the use of outdated wooden racking - from the point of view of those troublesome nails posing a threat to the paintwork; to the issue of sustainability, and simple economics.

Get my copy of 'The Containerised Car Transport Guide' now!

The likes of BMW, Tesla, and others would never dream of allowing their vehicles to be transported using wooden racking. Here are some of the reasons why:

Not Environmentally Friendly

Unlike steel constructed racking, wooden racks cannot be re-used so have destroyed and thrown away after one use. They also have to be coated with some highly-toxic chemicals and this is another complication, environmentally speaking, as the usual disposal method is by burning.

Not Space-Efficient

Logistically, wooden racks don’t make sense. It’s understandable if you only need to transport one or two cars in a container and cost is not an issue, but if you want to get more cars into a container, steel racks are far superior, making space for four or even six cars, depending on the size of the vehicles. Plus, wooden racks are a less secure and more time-consuming way of loading and transporting cars.

Doesn't Comply With US Standards

Finally, in our experience wooden wheel chocks are not approved for use on the US rail system so, ultimately, steel racks are the most reliable option. But, don’t just take our word for it, read about a recent study on the sustainability of wooden racks versus steel racks here.

The Containerised Car Transport Guide

The Containerised Car Transport Guide

Subscribe to Email Updates